काही लोक भगवान श्रीरामांना स्त्री-पुरुष भेद करणारा म्हणून ओरडत असतात....
त्यांनी सीतेचा त्याग केला.तिला वाऱ्यावर सोडले म्हणून ते "पुरुष प्रधान" संस्कृतीचे होते असे हि म्हणतात..
पण त्यांना हे माहित आहे का ??
त्यांनी स्वतःच्या भावाला म्हणजे "लक्ष्मण' ह्यांना पण स्वतःपासून दूर लोटले होते.
रामायणात मध्ये खालील प्रसंग बघा :-
त्याची कथा अशा प्रकारची.
एकदा कालपुरुष रामाशी चर्चेसाठी आला असता त्याने त्यास आपल्या एकांतात जर कोणी आला तर मृत्युदंडाची शिक्षा द्यावी असे सांगितले.
रामाने लक्ष्मणालाच कोणी आत येऊ नये म्हणून राखण करायला सांगितले. थोड्याच वेळात संतापी ॠषी दुर्वास तेथे आले असता,
त्यांनी मला आताच्या आता रामाला भेटायचे आहे व अवज्ञ केल्यास अयोध्या भस्मसात करेन असा धाक घातला.
लक्ष्मणाने नाईलाजाने आत प्रवेश केला. राजधर्माप्रमाणे रामाने सीतेप्रमाणेच दंड म्हणून अमात्य व मंत्री मंडळाच्या सल्ल्याप्रमाणे लक्षमणाचा त्याग केला. रामावाचून लक्ष्मण म्हणजे त्याचा मृत्युच. लक्ष्मणाने शरयु त प्राणांचा अवरोध करुन जलसमाधी घेतली.
हि कथा येथे थोडक्यात देण्याचे कारण की सीता त्याग हा लिंगभेदाचा प्रश्न नसून राजधर्माचा विषय होता,हे या लक्ष्मण त्यागाच्या प्रसंगावरुन स्पष्ट होत आहे. सीतेला ,एका स्त्रीला वेगळा न्याय व लक्ष्मणाला .एका पुरुषाला वेगळा न्याय असा प्रकार नव्हता.
ramayan he ek mahakavya aahe.te khare houn gelel nahi tyamule tya vyakti va valli kashya hotya hya vishayat kahihi artha nahi.keval sadvichar va sadvartanuk ghya.Ramahi shevati manusacha hota va manasachya hatuna chka hotat.fakt bhutakalatil chuka na karata tyatun kahi shikave
ReplyDelete@DHANANJAY,
ReplyDeleteramayan tumchya sathi zale nasel,amchya sathi zale aahe........
Vali and Sugriva were two brothers. They belonged to the Vanar race and came from a ruling family, which had its own kingdom the capital of which was Kishkindha. At the time when Sita was kidnapped by Ravana, Vali was reigning at Kishkindha. While Vali was on thethrone he was engaged in a war with a Rakshasa by name Mayavi.In the personal combat between the two, Mayavi ran for his life. Both Vali and Sugriva pursued him. Mayavi entered into a deep cavity in the earth. Vali asked Sugriva to wait at the mouth of the cavity and he went inside. After sometime a flood of blood came from inside the cavity. Sugriva concluded that Vali must have been killed by Mayavi and came to Kishkindha and got himself declared king in place of Vali and made Hanuman his PrimeMinister.
ReplyDeleteAs a matter of fact, Vali was not killed. It was Mayavi who was killed by Vali. Vali came out of thecavity but did not find Sugriva there. He proceeded to Kishkindha and to his great surprise he found that Sugriva had proclaimed himself king. Vali naturally became enraged at this act of treachery on the part of his brother Sugriva and he had good ground to be. Sugriva should have ascertained, should not merely have assumed, that Vali was dead. Secondly, Vali had a son by name Angad whom Sugriva should have made the king as the ligitimate heir of Vali. He did neither of the two things. His was a clear case of usurpation. Vali drove out Sugriva and took back the throne. The two brothers becamemortal enemies.
This occurred just after Ravana had kidnapped Sita. Rama and Laxman were wandering in search of her. Sugriva and Hanuman were wandering in search of friends who could help them regain the throne from Vali.The two parties met quite accidentally. After informing each other of their difficulties, a pact was arrived at between the two. It was agreed that Rama should help Sugriva to kill Vali and to establish him on the throne of Kishkinda. On the part of Sugriva and Hanuman it was agreed that they should help Rama to regain Sita. To enable Rama to fulfill his part of the pact it was planned that Sugriva should wear a garland around hisneck as to be easily distinguishable to Rama from Vali and that while the duel was going on Rama should conceal himself behind a tree and then shoot an arrow at Vali and kill him. Accordingly a duel was arranged, Sugriva with a garland around his neck, while the duel was on, Rama, standing behind a tree, shot Vali with his arrow andopened the way for Surgiva to be the king of Kiskinda.
This murder of Vali is the greatest blot on the characterof Rama. It was a crime which was thoroughly unprovoked, for Vali had no quarrel with Rama. It was a most cowardly act, for Vali was unarmed. It was a planned and premeditated murder.